The decision to suspend all sales activity on the Amazon platform is driven by a persistent, decades-long pattern of anti-competitive behavior. Our pursuit of fair retail options for our readers was met with a verifiable strategy designed to destroy our ability to sell at the intended retail cost.

---

I. Documented Patterns of Market Manipulation

The marketplace's use of coercive pricing to eliminate competition is a well-documented business strategy, evidenced by numerous public accounts and legal filings over the span of its existence. This strategy ensures marketplace dominance and prevents vendors from establishing alternative retail channels:

• The Loss-Leader Precedent: This strategy involves selling a product at a substantial loss—purchasing our books at wholesale and selling them far below cost. This is not competitive pricing; it is coercive price dumping used to eliminate independent and specialty retailers, resulting in the elimination of customer choice.
• Price Anchoring and Coercion: Accounts confirm a consistent pattern: vendors who attempt to establish direct retail sales are met with immediate, aggressive price suppression, forcing them to concede the Buy Box or have their entire product line anchored at an unsustainable, subsidized price.
• Demand for Vendor Concessions: Documented accounts show that once a vendor is financially weakened by price suppression, the marketplace leverages this pressure to demand further price concessions and discounts, accelerating the vendor's financial distress.

II. The Deliberate Delay Tactic

The administrative process for resolving pricing or policy disputes is widely documented as an intentional delay tactic designed to force vendors to abandon their pursuit of fair commerce. This strategy weaponizes the small vendor's limited resources:

• The Endless Cycle: Marketplace accounts confirm a cycle where issues are deliberately dragged out for many months. Representatives answer questions without delivering substantive resolution, forcing vendors to spend their time and resources in an endless loop until they "start over" or simply give up.
• Weaponizing Resources: This process is a clear maneuver to exhaust the vendor's financial and time resources. The vendor's choice becomes simple: give the marketplace the Buy Box at a loss, or spend resources fighting a battle designed to be unwinnable in the short term.
• The Ultimate Goal: The objective is to sustain the delay until the vendor implicitly agrees to the suppressed price or foregoes the entire retail channel, securing the marketplace's complete dominance.

III. The Ultimate Price: Market Void and Consumer Harm

While the low price is always tempting to the buyer, the eventual cost of this dominant market practice is paid by the consumer and the future of specialized publishing:

• Elimination of Options: The predatory pricing eliminates all competition (independent bookstores). The resulting monopoly ultimately leads to a market void where the consumer is forced to accept the terms of the sole dominant player, regardless of future price hikes or service quality.
• Reduced Quality and Availability: Specialized publishers, facing financial ruin from price dumping, cannot afford the high-quality production (e.g., specialized paper, binding) required for academic works. The ultimate cost is the erosion of product quality and the future availability of essential texts.
• The Price Hike Precedent: Historical analogies show that initial artificially low prices are followed by sharp price increases once market dominance is secured and all competition is eliminated. Buyers are ultimately forced to pay more for less selection and service.

By purchasing directly from mathpop.com, you are supporting market diversity, ensuring the sustainable quality of essential academic texts, and casting a vote against these destructive tactics.

Return to Official Catalogue Distribution Status Report →